The future of the constitutional jurisdiction: dialogues between institutional change and theories of intepretation

Authors

  • Lenio Luiz Streck Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
  • Ziel Ferreira Lopes Universidade Federal do Vale do Sâo Franscisco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18759/rdgf.v23i2.2214

Abstract

In this article, we seek to provide an overview of debates on the future of judicial review, analyzing critically the main positions and taking sides in their dispute. To achieve this objective, we proceeded as follows: 1) we diagnosed some of the legal problems related to dysfunctions in democratic countries; 2) we identified the institutional changes advocated in this period; and 3) we discuss how the judicial review would be adequate to the problems we diagnose, correlating this debate on new institutional arrangements to the state of the art on theories of interpretation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lenio Luiz Streck, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos

Pós-doutorado pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa (FDUL). Doutor em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Professor titular da Universidade do Vale do Rio Sinos (UNISINOS/RS) e da Universidade Estácio de Sá (UNESA/RJ). Membro catedrático da Academia Brasileira de Direito Constitucional — ABDConst. Coordenador do Dasein — Núcleo de Estudos Hermenêuticos. Advogado. Ex-Procurador de Justiça do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul.

Published

2022-11-30

How to Cite

Streck, L. L., & Lopes, Z. F. (2022). The future of the constitutional jurisdiction: dialogues between institutional change and theories of intepretation. Revista De Direitos E Garantias Fundamentais, 23(2), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.18759/rdgf.v23i2.2214

Issue

Section

Hermeneutics, Constitutional Jurisdiction and Citizenship